Skip to main content

The hypocrisy of 2nd Amendment champions

The tide is turning in America. Long-churning sentiments about guns and gun violence have finally erupted and people no longer accept the tired-old narrative of "let's not politicize this issue". No, let's actually do that for a change.

Democracy is a political system. Any issue that concerns democratic citizens is a political issue by default and this includes guns and gun control. People can grieve and respect the victims and the survivors while also calling out for change. These are not mutually exclusive. But whenever a call for change is heard, there's always another call from across the street calling for stagnancy. In this case, it's coming from the 2nd Amendment die-hards.

Let me be clear here, I'm not talking about the people who simply want to have a firearm or two for legitimate self-defense. The people I'm referring to are the ones who amass a stockade's worth of armaments as if they're expecting the Queen's forces to try and reclaim the empire's lost colonies. I'm talking about the ones that scream "Shall not be infringed" from the top of their lungs and swarm social media like roaches, trying to infest every corner with their zealotry.

Some appeal to conspiracies, denouncing the shootings as 'hoaxes' and the survivors as 'crisis actors' and 'government shills'. Some try to get the discussion boggled down to the technicalities of what constitutes a fully-automatic weapon and what really counts as an assault rifle; some outright refuse even the mildest forms of regulation, such as background checks, for fear of the tyrannical government infringing upon their freedoms. 'Don't tread on me' and all that.

Here's the thing, though -- regulation is part and parcel of the 2nd amendment. It's in the "well-regulated militia" bit. But I'm afraid the hypocrisy of these folks runs far deeper than this, and I'll try and illustrate this with a few questions directed at them:

Where were your great-grandparents when the US government illegally locked up Japanese-Americans in internment camps?

Where were your grandparents when black people -- your fellow Americans -- were being hosed down, beaten up, maligned and disparaged for decades on end just for demanding equal treatment under the law?

Where were your parents when the CIA flooded predominantly black neighborhoods with cocaine?

And lastly, where are you while scores of your fellow Americans keep being mowed down by police every day across the nation?

If you don't use your guns to protect the life, liberty and pursuit of happiness of your fellow citizens against the encroachment of government, then the 2nd Amendment is useless and you don't deserve it. Because you can't just appeal to the law when it suits you and disregard it when it doesn't.  If you don't want your rights -- or rather privileges -- to be infringed, then fight for them in principle, not just in word. Only then will you have earned the privilege of the 2nd Amendment.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Art of the Spiel: Will Trump Negotiate a Good Deal with North Korea?

For all we know, this may actually happen. The only reason why Kim is willing to hold this unprecedented meeting with Trump is that he believes he can pull a fast one on him (and he has good reason to think so). However, what I'd really want to know is why he thinks that this is enough. Because getting Trump to go along with you seems to be fairly easy so long as you push the right buttons (e.g. tell him he has big manly hands or that he's doing a real bang-up job at the Oval Office). But then how is he going to get Congress to go along with it? Especially with the midterm elections threatening Republicans' control of the House and the Senate, since there is no way Democrats are going to go along with anything  Trump suggests. The answer is bullying. Here's what I mean by that and I'll explain it by describing how I think things are going to go down: First, Trump and Kim are going to meet in Trump's typical unorthodox (i.e. disorganized) fashion an...

When atheists grovel at the doorstep of religion

There's been a growing sentiment among some of my fellow atheists, spurred by one Jordan Peterson, around the idea of finding new meaning in religion without all that pesky dogma and superstition. But why would anyone do that? Now, let me first clear my throat by saying that I sympathize with all my fellow primates who are in search of purpose in their lives. What destinations we reach, if we reach any at all, are entirely up to us, as individuals, treading along beaten and unbeaten paths. We're a flawed species and so the way we approach everything will be flawed as well. However, there comes a time when you have to ask yourself if you haven't lost your way in your quest for meaning. I recently watched a thought-provoking video by YouTuber Mouthy Buddha (embedded above). In it, he talks about the failure of atheism to fill the vacuum of values and meaning left by the abandonment of religion. He suggests that one may be misguided in relinquishing the supposedly w...